New York Judge Clears KuCoin, Chainalysis in Hack Lawsuit

A U.S. District Judge in New York dismissed a proposed class-action lawsuit on , that sought to hold cryptocurrency exchange KuCoin and blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis liable for a hack involving stolen digital assets. The ruling by Judge Gregory H. Woods of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York found that the plaintiffs failed to adequately allege federal racketeering and theft claims against both entities.

Judge Gregory H. Woods of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled that KuCoin, operated by Flashdot Ltd., and Chainalysis do not have to face a proposed class action lawsuit. Plaintiffs Sofia Reca and James Supples had brought the suit on behalf of individuals whose digital assets were allegedly stolen and subsequently landed on KuCoin‘s platform. The court determined that the plaintiffs did not sufficiently demonstrate grounds for federal racketeering (RICO) claims against either KuCoin or Chainalysis, leading to the dismissal of these claims with finality.

The proposed class action lawsuit alleged that KuCoin and Chainalysis were involved in the aftermath of a crypto hack where digital assets were stolen. The plaintiffs’ claims included allegations under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act and common law theft. While the specifics of the hack in question were not detailed in the dismissal, the core of the lawsuit centered on the alleged movement and handling of these stolen funds, purportedly implicating KuCoin as a destination for some of the assets and Chainalysis in its role as a blockchain tracing service.

This federal court dismissal is distinct from a separate, prior legal action involving KuCoin in New York. In , KuCoin reached a settlement with New York Attorney General Letitia James, agreeing to pay over $22 million in fines and refunds and to cease operations for New York residents. This settlement resolved allegations that KuCoin had operated as an unregistered securities and commodities broker-dealer within the state. Under that agreement, KuCoin was required to refund more than $16.7 million to approximately 177,800 New York investors and pay a $5.3 million penalty to the state.

Chainalysis is a prominent blockchain analytics firm known for its tools that aid in tracing cryptocurrency transactions, often used by law enforcement and financial institutions. The company’s blockchain analysis tools have been deemed reliable and admissible as evidence in various court cases, such as in United States v. Sterlingov, where Chainalysis Reactor (now rebranded as Investigations) was validated for linking cryptocurrency transactions to real-world entities. Chainalysis has also reported assisting partners with the seizure and freezing of approximately $34 billion worth of cryptocurrency as of year-end 2025.

Judge Woods’ decision to dismiss the lawsuit stemmed from the plaintiffs’ inability to sufficiently establish the necessary legal grounds for their claims. Specifically, the court found that the federal racketeering claims were not adequately pleaded against either KuCoin or Chainalysis. The dismissal indicates a failure by the plaintiffs to meet the pleading standards required for such complex legal actions in federal court.

Specific details regarding the original hack that prompted the lawsuit, including the exact date, the total value of assets stolen, or the number of affected users, were not explicitly detailed in the dismissal report. The full extent of the plaintiffs’ alleged losses and how they linked these to the defendants remain unclear in the public record of this particular ruling.

The dismissal with finality suggests a strong judicial stance against the current claims, though plaintiffs may explore options such as appealing the decision or refiling with revised allegations if permissible. This ruling could influence how future class-action lawsuits targeting cryptocurrency exchanges and blockchain analytics firms are framed, particularly concerning federal racketeering claims related to digital asset hacks.

Cryptocurrency users should prioritize securing their digital assets through robust security practices, including enabling two-factor authentication (2FA) on all exchange accounts and using strong, unique passwords. Users should also research the regulatory compliance and security measures of any platform they use. In cases of asset theft, individuals should immediately report incidents to the affected platforms and relevant law enforcement agencies, while also consulting legal counsel to understand potential avenues for recourse.

Follow us on Bluesky , LinkedIn , and X to Get Instant Updates