-0.33%
-0.49%
-2.77%
-1.04%
-1.21%
-6.76%
The draft defines a crypto asset as a digital representation of value that is not issued by a central bank and can be traded, transferred, or stored electronically using cryptographic techniques and distributed ledger technology. It stops short of calling these assets currency. Instead, they would fall under the definition of capital, which pulls their movement under existing exchange controls.
Under the new regulations, crypto asset service providers already recognised under the Financial Intelligence Centre Act would need explicit authorisation from the Treasury, a role that mirrors authorised dealers in foreign exchange and gold. Buying or selling above a threshold yet to be set would have to run through an authorised provider or receive direct Treasury approval. Providers could also be barred from dealing with specific entities or facilitating certain types of transactions.
What Ordinary Holders Would Face
Individual users would carry obligations of their own under the draft:
- Run relevant transactions through authorised providers and supply information showing compliance
- Offer any unused portion of crypto bought for a stated purpose for sale, in rand, to the Treasury or an authorised provider
- Get permission before sending crypto out of the country or paying non-residents, unless the transaction falls below a prescribed threshold
- Declare holdings above a set threshold in writing within , after which the declared assets cannot be sold or transferred without permission
- Possibly declare crypto holdings when entering or leaving the country
Searches, Seizures, and Prison Time
Enforcement powers would be broad. Authorities could search individuals and consignments, seize suspected crypto assets, and ultimately forfeit them to the National Revenue Fund. People who own or control forfeited assets could be compelled to hand over passwords or access codes.
Providers that breach the rules could face fines, public censure, or license revocation. Criminal contraventions carry penalties of up to R1 million in fines, five years in prison, or both, and the fine can match the value of the assets involved if that figure is higher.
Most of these triggers depend on numbers the draft does not contain. The thresholds for transactions, transfers, and declarations will be set by the Minister of Finance through later notices in the Government Gazette.
Hashlytics Take
The blanks matter more than the text. Without thresholds, no one can say whether this targets large capital flight or catches everyday retail users, and the answer changes who this law is really for. The declaration rule also looks self-defeating on paper: holders who declare lose the freedom to sell or move their assets without permission, which hands people a reason not to declare at all. That leaves the password and access code powers as the state’s route to self-custodied holdings, the one place a provider-based system cannot see. Expect the comment period to be fought over those two points, not the definition of a crypto asset.
Follow Hashlytics on Bluesky, Facebook, LinkedIn , Telegram and X to Get Instant Updates



